Prestigious Symposium On AI Lawyering Reveals Keen Insights Including The Ardent Debate On Whether To Use Generative AI In Law School Education
The post Prestigious Symposium On AI Lawyering Reveals Keen Insights Including The Ardent Debate On Whether To Use Generative AI In Law School Education appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Should law students be using generative AI in law school? You decide. getty In today’s column, I will be providing commentary and coverage of a prestigious symposium on AI lawyering that was recently jointly undertaken by the Tsai Center for Law, Science and Innovation of the SMU Dedman School of Law and with Wake Forest Law via a special event entitled “AI Lawyering: Adapting to the Era of ChatGPT and Large Language Models”. The range of topics encompassed at the symposium consisted of three major areas of focus: (1) AI in legal education, (2) AI in legal practice, and (3) AI as viewed from the bench, the ABA, and state bars. I participated as a speaker in the third session and will be sharing herein highlights of the entire event. All told this important get-together was an invigorating and notable confluence of perspectives by law firms, solo lawyers, legal practitioners, legal scholars/academics, and others stridently interested in the future of lawyering as impacted by AI. First, let’s lay out the notable panelists and their affiliations. The panel on AI in legal education consisted of speakers Raina Haque, Wake Forest University School of Law, Rachelle Holmes Perkins, George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School, Dan Schwarcz, University of Minnesota Law School, and was ably moderated by Keith Robinson, Wake Forest University School of Law. This was a stirring exploration of whether or not to use generative AI in law schools and got the event off to a fast start. In a moment, I’ll be examining the keystones revealed, doing so in my own words, and will be using the points made as a launching pad to closely unpack a heated and altogether contentious and extremely timely topic. The panel on AI in legal practice included speakers Rob Hill, Holland & Knight,…
The post Prestigious Symposium On AI Lawyering Reveals Keen Insights Including The Ardent Debate On Whether To Use Generative AI In Law School Education appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.
Should law students be using generative AI in law school? You decide. getty In today’s column, I will be providing commentary and coverage of a prestigious symposium on AI lawyering that was recently jointly undertaken by the Tsai Center for Law, Science and Innovation of the SMU Dedman School of Law and with Wake Forest Law via a special event entitled “AI Lawyering: Adapting to the Era of ChatGPT and Large Language Models”. The range of topics encompassed at the symposium consisted of three major areas of focus: (1) AI in legal education, (2) AI in legal practice, and (3) AI as viewed from the bench, the ABA, and state bars. I participated as a speaker in the third session and will be sharing herein highlights of the entire event. All told this important get-together was an invigorating and notable confluence of perspectives by law firms, solo lawyers, legal practitioners, legal scholars/academics, and others stridently interested in the future of lawyering as impacted by AI. First, let’s lay out the notable panelists and their affiliations. The panel on AI in legal education consisted of speakers Raina Haque, Wake Forest University School of Law, Rachelle Holmes Perkins, George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School, Dan Schwarcz, University of Minnesota Law School, and was ably moderated by Keith Robinson, Wake Forest University School of Law. This was a stirring exploration of whether or not to use generative AI in law schools and got the event off to a fast start. In a moment, I’ll be examining the keystones revealed, doing so in my own words, and will be using the points made as a launching pad to closely unpack a heated and altogether contentious and extremely timely topic. The panel on AI in legal practice included speakers Rob Hill, Holland & Knight,…
What's Your Reaction?
