VC Recommends Fresh Perspective for AI Copyright Laws
The post VC Recommends Fresh Perspective for AI Copyright Laws appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Venture Capitalist Vinod Khosla argues that artificial intelligence (AI) copyright laws should prioritize output results rather than how it’s trained. “To best think about the copyright issues in AI training, we should focus on output similarity and not training methodology,” the report stated. Khosla Urges Focus on AI Output, Not Training Methods In a comprehensive report, Khosla explains that materials throughout history have often been derived from earlier works: “All humans train on cumulative learning from many past works by other humans. AI may train on just a larger set of past works and be subject to similar rules and constraints but no more and no different.” Khosla suggests a different approach to the ongoing debate about legal suits against AI. Instead of how it’s trained, the focus should be on what it creates, especially if it’s similar to what artists make. Creative industry participants have recently initiated legal actions against AI companies, questioning the use of their clients’ works in the AI’s training data. On October 20, BeInCrypto reported that Universal Music Group (UMG) along with other publishers have launched a lawsuit against Anthropic artificial intelligence (AI) firm. The dispute revolves around Anthropic’s AI model, Claude 2, allegedly distributing copyrighted lyrics. UMG contends that Anthropic is doing so without securing the necessary licenses. The lawsuit argues that Claude 2 has generated phrases resembling existing lyrics, even without explicit prompts. It additionally claims that the program possesses the capability to create lyrics similar to renowned artists. The filing cited various artists including Katy Perry and the Rolling Stones. Meanwhile, technology firm Story Protocol has secured $54 million in funding to address copyright infringements caused by generative AI technologies. The prominent VC firm Andreessen Horowitz led the funding round. Various other VC firms participated, which, in exchange for equity, are providing the…
The post VC Recommends Fresh Perspective for AI Copyright Laws appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.
Venture Capitalist Vinod Khosla argues that artificial intelligence (AI) copyright laws should prioritize output results rather than how it’s trained. “To best think about the copyright issues in AI training, we should focus on output similarity and not training methodology,” the report stated. Khosla Urges Focus on AI Output, Not Training Methods In a comprehensive report, Khosla explains that materials throughout history have often been derived from earlier works: “All humans train on cumulative learning from many past works by other humans. AI may train on just a larger set of past works and be subject to similar rules and constraints but no more and no different.” Khosla suggests a different approach to the ongoing debate about legal suits against AI. Instead of how it’s trained, the focus should be on what it creates, especially if it’s similar to what artists make. Creative industry participants have recently initiated legal actions against AI companies, questioning the use of their clients’ works in the AI’s training data. On October 20, BeInCrypto reported that Universal Music Group (UMG) along with other publishers have launched a lawsuit against Anthropic artificial intelligence (AI) firm. The dispute revolves around Anthropic’s AI model, Claude 2, allegedly distributing copyrighted lyrics. UMG contends that Anthropic is doing so without securing the necessary licenses. The lawsuit argues that Claude 2 has generated phrases resembling existing lyrics, even without explicit prompts. It additionally claims that the program possesses the capability to create lyrics similar to renowned artists. The filing cited various artists including Katy Perry and the Rolling Stones. Meanwhile, technology firm Story Protocol has secured $54 million in funding to address copyright infringements caused by generative AI technologies. The prominent VC firm Andreessen Horowitz led the funding round. Various other VC firms participated, which, in exchange for equity, are providing the…
What's Your Reaction?
