WLFI Token Frozen: Founder Bruno Skvorc Claims Theft as ZachXBT Blasts Flawed Compliance Tools
The post WLFI Token Frozen: Founder Bruno Skvorc Claims Theft as ZachXBT Blasts Flawed Compliance Tools appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WLFI token was frozen by the WLFI team after an address was flagged for “high-risk blockchain activities,” blocking the founder Bruno Skvorc’s access. On-chain investigator ZachXBT warns mainstream compliance tools often mislabel addresses, causing wrongful freezes and raising concerns about automated censorship in token compliance workflows. WLFI token freeze confirmed Founder Bruno Skvorc reports funds taken and inability to appeal the freeze. On-chain analysis by ZachXBT shows common compliance tools can wrongly flag addresses, implicating unrelated wallets. WLFI token frozen after high-risk flag; Bruno Skvorc claims funds stolen—read the full update and expert analysis from COINOTAG. Stay informed now. What happened when the WLFI token was frozen? WLFI token frozen after the WLFI team flagged an address for “high-risk blockchain activities,” preventing the founder from accessing funds. COINOTAG News reported Bruno Skvorc’s statement that he cannot appeal the action, while on-chain analyst ZachXBT highlighted systemic flaws in automated compliance tools that can misclassify addresses. Why did the WLFI team freeze the address? The WLFI team stated the address was “suspected of engaging in high-risk blockchain activities” and therefore cannot be unfrozen. This designation often arises from automated compliance tools that score wallets based on transaction history, interactions with flagged contracts, or proximity to addresses previously classified as risky. How do compliance tools mislabel addresses? On-chain detective ZachXBT explained that many tools mark certain exchanges, smart contracts, or addresses as “high-risk” incorrectly. He found cases where a wallet was flagged only because an unrelated address several hops away had been labeled risky. This creates false positives that can lead teams to freeze tokens unjustly. Frequently Asked Questions What does “high-risk blockchain activities” mean for a token? It typically refers to patterns linked to scams, sanctions, or illicit services flagged by compliance tools. A high-risk label can trigger custodial or team-level restrictions…
The post WLFI Token Frozen: Founder Bruno Skvorc Claims Theft as ZachXBT Blasts Flawed Compliance Tools appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.
WLFI token was frozen by the WLFI team after an address was flagged for “high-risk blockchain activities,” blocking the founder Bruno Skvorc’s access. On-chain investigator ZachXBT warns mainstream compliance tools often mislabel addresses, causing wrongful freezes and raising concerns about automated censorship in token compliance workflows. WLFI token freeze confirmed Founder Bruno Skvorc reports funds taken and inability to appeal the freeze. On-chain analysis by ZachXBT shows common compliance tools can wrongly flag addresses, implicating unrelated wallets. WLFI token frozen after high-risk flag; Bruno Skvorc claims funds stolen—read the full update and expert analysis from COINOTAG. Stay informed now. What happened when the WLFI token was frozen? WLFI token frozen after the WLFI team flagged an address for “high-risk blockchain activities,” preventing the founder from accessing funds. COINOTAG News reported Bruno Skvorc’s statement that he cannot appeal the action, while on-chain analyst ZachXBT highlighted systemic flaws in automated compliance tools that can misclassify addresses. Why did the WLFI team freeze the address? The WLFI team stated the address was “suspected of engaging in high-risk blockchain activities” and therefore cannot be unfrozen. This designation often arises from automated compliance tools that score wallets based on transaction history, interactions with flagged contracts, or proximity to addresses previously classified as risky. How do compliance tools mislabel addresses? On-chain detective ZachXBT explained that many tools mark certain exchanges, smart contracts, or addresses as “high-risk” incorrectly. He found cases where a wallet was flagged only because an unrelated address several hops away had been labeled risky. This creates false positives that can lead teams to freeze tokens unjustly. Frequently Asked Questions What does “high-risk blockchain activities” mean for a token? It typically refers to patterns linked to scams, sanctions, or illicit services flagged by compliance tools. A high-risk label can trigger custodial or team-level restrictions…
What's Your Reaction?
