Zelenskyy’s attire divides Polymarket with $79M at stake
The post Zelenskyy’s attire divides Polymarket with $79M at stake appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Initial ruling of “yes” on 24 June appearance has been formally challenged. Debate centres on lack of tie, trainers, and formality of attire. Background includes past bet confusion and political pressure from Trump. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s attire has unintentionally sparked a multimillion-dollar crypto betting frenzy. A simple prediction on Polymarket—asking whether Zelenskyy would appear in a suit by the end of June—has evolved into a $79 million conundrum over what counts as a suit. The wager, originally intended as a light-hearted market, has escalated into a contentious debate now entangled in rule interpretations, public appearances, and even political optics. Polymarket ruling contested as images from NATO visit go viral The current round of confusion began on 24 June, when Zelenskyy attended a NATO gathering in the Netherlands. He was photographed in a dark jacket, shirt, matching trousers, and trainers. The images circulated rapidly, and many on the decentralized betting platform Polymarket interpreted the outfit as a suit. Polymarket had opened the market on 22 May, posing the question: “Will Zelenskyy wear a suit before July?” The original terms specified the outfit had to qualify as a suit in “a commonly accepted” sense. Following the appearance, the platform initially ruled “yes,” triggering a partial payout. But this decision was soon contested by some traders who argued that Zelenskyy’s look lacked formal shoes, a tie, or sufficient distinction between formalwear and casual attire. This marks the second such dispute on Polymarket involving Zelenskyy’s clothes. In May, a similar market had also closed amid controversy after Zelenskyy wore a matching jacket and trousers without a tie, prompting some to argue the outfit technically met the suit criteria. Fashion writer Derek Guy had weighed in then, suggesting the items were cut from the same cloth, satisfying the definition of a suit despite the…
The post Zelenskyy’s attire divides Polymarket with $79M at stake appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.
Initial ruling of “yes” on 24 June appearance has been formally challenged. Debate centres on lack of tie, trainers, and formality of attire. Background includes past bet confusion and political pressure from Trump. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s attire has unintentionally sparked a multimillion-dollar crypto betting frenzy. A simple prediction on Polymarket—asking whether Zelenskyy would appear in a suit by the end of June—has evolved into a $79 million conundrum over what counts as a suit. The wager, originally intended as a light-hearted market, has escalated into a contentious debate now entangled in rule interpretations, public appearances, and even political optics. Polymarket ruling contested as images from NATO visit go viral The current round of confusion began on 24 June, when Zelenskyy attended a NATO gathering in the Netherlands. He was photographed in a dark jacket, shirt, matching trousers, and trainers. The images circulated rapidly, and many on the decentralized betting platform Polymarket interpreted the outfit as a suit. Polymarket had opened the market on 22 May, posing the question: “Will Zelenskyy wear a suit before July?” The original terms specified the outfit had to qualify as a suit in “a commonly accepted” sense. Following the appearance, the platform initially ruled “yes,” triggering a partial payout. But this decision was soon contested by some traders who argued that Zelenskyy’s look lacked formal shoes, a tie, or sufficient distinction between formalwear and casual attire. This marks the second such dispute on Polymarket involving Zelenskyy’s clothes. In May, a similar market had also closed amid controversy after Zelenskyy wore a matching jacket and trousers without a tie, prompting some to argue the outfit technically met the suit criteria. Fashion writer Derek Guy had weighed in then, suggesting the items were cut from the same cloth, satisfying the definition of a suit despite the…
What's Your Reaction?
