Mango Markets Hacker Avi Eisenberg Sentenced to 52 Months in Prison

The post Mango Markets Hacker Avi Eisenberg Sentenced to 52 Months in Prison appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Avraham “Avi” Eisenberg, the individual responsible for the $110 million exploit of the decentralized finance (DeFi) platform Mango Markets in 2022, has been sentenced to 52 months in prison. The sentencing was for his guilty plea to charges related to the possession of child sexual abuse material (CSAM). This conviction comes despite his earlier conviction on crypto theft charges. A federal judge, however, has indicated that a retrial for the Mango Markets-related charges may be considered in the future. Mango Markets Hacker Sentenced to 52 months Avraham “Avi” Eisenberg sentence comes after a year-long legal battle concerning his role in the Mango Markets attack. Although the $110 million crypto theft was a big deal, it was the CSAM charges that ultimately drove his sentence. Amid this crisis, recently, an elderly victim in the US also fell for a Bitcoin theft scam worth around $330M. In 2024, Eisenberg pleaded guilty to possession of more than 1,200 images and videos of child sexual abuse.  As well, the content included depictions of minors, including infants. The judge said these offenses were serious enough to require a prison sentence to deter the distribution of such material. During the sentencing, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian noted Eisenberg’s efforts to come to terms with the pain caused by his actions. Nevertheless, the judge argued that prison time was necessary. After his release, Eisenberg is also expected to serve five years of probation. He will also have to install monitoring software on his electronic devices and follow outpatient drug treatment programs as part of his probation condition. Criminal History and Legal Arguments Previously, Avraham “Avi” Eisenberg’s legal team argued the fraud charges concerning Mango Market exploit warranted a retrial. They argued the case should not be tried in the Southern District of New York. The defense also…

May 2, 2025 - 15:00
 0  1
Mango Markets Hacker Avi Eisenberg Sentenced to 52 Months in Prison

The post Mango Markets Hacker Avi Eisenberg Sentenced to 52 Months in Prison appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.

Avraham “Avi” Eisenberg, the individual responsible for the $110 million exploit of the decentralized finance (DeFi) platform Mango Markets in 2022, has been sentenced to 52 months in prison. The sentencing was for his guilty plea to charges related to the possession of child sexual abuse material (CSAM). This conviction comes despite his earlier conviction on crypto theft charges. A federal judge, however, has indicated that a retrial for the Mango Markets-related charges may be considered in the future. Mango Markets Hacker Sentenced to 52 months Avraham “Avi” Eisenberg sentence comes after a year-long legal battle concerning his role in the Mango Markets attack. Although the $110 million crypto theft was a big deal, it was the CSAM charges that ultimately drove his sentence. Amid this crisis, recently, an elderly victim in the US also fell for a Bitcoin theft scam worth around $330M. In 2024, Eisenberg pleaded guilty to possession of more than 1,200 images and videos of child sexual abuse.  As well, the content included depictions of minors, including infants. The judge said these offenses were serious enough to require a prison sentence to deter the distribution of such material. During the sentencing, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian noted Eisenberg’s efforts to come to terms with the pain caused by his actions. Nevertheless, the judge argued that prison time was necessary. After his release, Eisenberg is also expected to serve five years of probation. He will also have to install monitoring software on his electronic devices and follow outpatient drug treatment programs as part of his probation condition. Criminal History and Legal Arguments Previously, Avraham “Avi” Eisenberg’s legal team argued the fraud charges concerning Mango Market exploit warranted a retrial. They argued the case should not be tried in the Southern District of New York. The defense also…

What's Your Reaction?

like

dislike

love

funny

angry

sad

wow