Swan Chain Boosts Filecoin with Scalable zk-SNARK Computing
The post Swan Chain Boosts Filecoin with Scalable zk-SNARK Computing appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Swan Chain processes Filecoin’s Commit2 zk-SNARKs using GPU-powered off-chain computing for efficient sealing proof validation. The zk-UBI Pool distributes zk-SNARK workloads to providers, enabling scalable Filecoin computation with automated task assignment. Behind the decentralized data storage process, which is said to be “perpetually undeletable,” there’s actually some serious backend work. One of them: sealing. And it’s at this point that Swan Chain emerges as a new player, helping complete Filecoin’s Commit2 process, using zk-SNARK technology. In short, Swan is helping Filecoin with its heavy lifting—but doing it off-chain. Swan’s zk-UBI Pool Turns Heavy Proofs Into Shared Workloads Uniquely, this process involves a distributed network of computing providers, not just a single data center. These providers complete computational proofs and then send the final results to Filecoin for verification. This not only saves time but also makes the process more scalable. By leveraging the widely available GPU infrastructure, they can boost efficiency without having to build new hardware. Just imagine, for a single 32 GB sector, the Commit2 process can consume up to 275 GB of memory. If you’re using a home laptop, it could crash from the first minute. .@swan_chain processes Filecoin zk-SNARK workloads such as Commit2 across a network of computing providers. These providers complete sealing proofs off-chain and submit verified results to Filecoin. The system applies existing GPU infrastructure for protocol tasks. pic.twitter.com/nma2ieoq0L — Filecoin (@Filecoin) July 18, 2025 Furthermore, Swan also designed a task distribution system called zk-UBI Pool. This is a kind of automated labor market for zk proofs, which adjusts the workload based on the provider’s capacity. So there’s no such thing as a server being exhausted on one side while another is idle. Besides being efficient, they also provide incentives for anyone who successfully completes a task. The model is similar to freelance work,…
The post Swan Chain Boosts Filecoin with Scalable zk-SNARK Computing appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com.
Swan Chain processes Filecoin’s Commit2 zk-SNARKs using GPU-powered off-chain computing for efficient sealing proof validation. The zk-UBI Pool distributes zk-SNARK workloads to providers, enabling scalable Filecoin computation with automated task assignment. Behind the decentralized data storage process, which is said to be “perpetually undeletable,” there’s actually some serious backend work. One of them: sealing. And it’s at this point that Swan Chain emerges as a new player, helping complete Filecoin’s Commit2 process, using zk-SNARK technology. In short, Swan is helping Filecoin with its heavy lifting—but doing it off-chain. Swan’s zk-UBI Pool Turns Heavy Proofs Into Shared Workloads Uniquely, this process involves a distributed network of computing providers, not just a single data center. These providers complete computational proofs and then send the final results to Filecoin for verification. This not only saves time but also makes the process more scalable. By leveraging the widely available GPU infrastructure, they can boost efficiency without having to build new hardware. Just imagine, for a single 32 GB sector, the Commit2 process can consume up to 275 GB of memory. If you’re using a home laptop, it could crash from the first minute. .@swan_chain processes Filecoin zk-SNARK workloads such as Commit2 across a network of computing providers. These providers complete sealing proofs off-chain and submit verified results to Filecoin. The system applies existing GPU infrastructure for protocol tasks. pic.twitter.com/nma2ieoq0L — Filecoin (@Filecoin) July 18, 2025 Furthermore, Swan also designed a task distribution system called zk-UBI Pool. This is a kind of automated labor market for zk proofs, which adjusts the workload based on the provider’s capacity. So there’s no such thing as a server being exhausted on one side while another is idle. Besides being efficient, they also provide incentives for anyone who successfully completes a task. The model is similar to freelance work,…
What's Your Reaction?
